Search blog.co.uk

Inconvenient Truths

by williamshepherd @ 2007-08-20 - 10:38:52

Inconvenient Truth One

There was acute embarrassment at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) following the exposure of a serious flaw in its record of US surface temperatures since 1880. The error was so glaring that on 7th August 2007 GISS had to post revised figures which show instead of temperatures reaching their highest level in the past decade that the hottest year of the 20th century was not 1998 but 1934. Of the ten warmest years since 1880 it turns out that four were in the 1930s and only three in the past decade.

According to Christopher Booker writing in the Sunday Telegraph on Sunday 19th August 2007, the significance of this is that the head of GISS is James Hansen the inventor of global warming and for the past 20 years, Al 'Inconvenient Truth' Gore's closest scientific ally in his promotion of the global warming scare. The revised figures relate only to temperatures in North America but the fact that the pre-eminent scientific champion of the orthodoxy has been promoting erroneous data has considerable implications.

The expert responsible for spotting GISS's error was Stephen McIntyre, a Canadian computer analyst who four years ago scored the greatest coup in the history of this debate by demolishing the notorious hockey stick - the graph which purported to show temperatures flat-lining for centuries until they suddenly began an exponential rise in the late 20th century was produced by concealing data for the Medieval Warm Period recognised by all historians of the period. The hockey stick was adopted as the supreme icon of the global warming lobby led by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which reproduced it no fewer than five times in its 2001 sexed-up report.

Since McIntyre exposed the mass of basic computer errors on which it was based, the IPCC in its most recent dodgy dossier quietly dropped it. The new GISS graph, conceding that the last decade may not have seen the hottest years of the past century, follows the latest satellite figures from the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) showing that in recent years global temperatures have not continued to rise (as orthodox CO2 warming theory would suggest) but have flattened out at a level significantly lower than in 1998.

Inconvenient Truth Two

Officials in the UK Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform briefed ministers on how to explain to the EU's energy commissioner Andris Piebalgs that the UK will not be able to comply with a European Council decision in March 2007 that the EU must derive 20 percent of its energy from renewable sources by 2020.

The officials calculated that this could cost UK electricity users alone an additional 22 billion pounds a year equivalent to two thousand pounds per household. This is two percent of GDP and double Sir Nicholas Stern's estimate for the entire cost of halting global warming.

Whitehall officials advised the Government that the target was not remotely achievable anyway and, taking a leaf out of the Yes Minister Handbook, recommended ministers to start being economical with the actualite. So expect nuclear power to become sustainable (as well as carbon-lite) again. Germany meanwhile would like to move the target up seven percentage points to 27 percent.

Inconvenient Truth Three

Cuts in greenhouse gas emissions on the scale proposed by Al Gore might possibly save $12 trillion but their cost would be $34 trillion.
Professor William Nordhaus of Yale - the world's leading expert on the financial costs of tackling global warming.

Then there are the inconvenient supplementaries as to who pick up the costs and the benefits. Who? Whom?

more from Shepherd on Climate

Trackback address for this post:

authimage

Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments

creditos [Visitor]
http://www.creditomagazine.es
20/08/07 @ 11:49

Here is a small sample of the side of the debate we almost never hear:
Appearing before the Commons Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development last year, Carleton University paleoclimatologist Professor Tim Patterson testified, "There is no meaningful correlation between CO2 levels and Earth's temperature over this [geologic] time frame. In fact, when CO2 levels were over ten times higher than they are now, about 450 million years ago, the planet was in the depths of the absolute coldest period in the last half billion years." Patterson asked the committee, "On the basis of this evidence, how could anyone still believe that the recent relatively small increase in CO2 levels would be the major cause of the past century's modest warming?"

Carlos Menéndez
http://www.creditomagazine.es

Ian Gordon [Visitor]
http://tokyobabylon.wordpress.com/
20/08/07 @ 13:28

It's a pity that such scare tactics are needed to whip the indolent masses into doing something about the state of the planet.

I will continue to talk about global warming because it's something that everyone has heard about, but in reality whether it's getting warmer or not we're still messing up our planet and arguing endlessly about the hows when everyone who reads this has a flush and forget toilet in their house.

It's a wake up call. It's got momentum. So what if our geological time frame doesn't give enough evidence to support global warming definitively? I say if it gets people to take responsibility for the environment I'll call it a blessing and leave it at that.

Global warming is being used as an excuse to drastically limit corporate liabilities for polluting the world by focussing on one tiny part of the global tonnage of crap released - the greenhouse gases. Hence Para 5 below...for background read England's Climate & Energy Policy or visit my climate website for more on the politics of climate change.

Here I contrast what Tony Blair actually said about energy in his 2006 Labour Party Conference speech with what he should have said. Here is what he should have said which was rewritten by me and then condensed to the 180 words reported in the UK media. Here is what Blair didn't say.

'Ten years ago it was blindingly obvious that energy self sufficiency was the right energy policy goal. Ten years ago it was blindingly obvious that nuclear power was a dead-end technology. Nothing has changed. Global warming and the greenhouse effect are fantasy not fact. To imagine governments can stabilize the Earth’s atmosphere is arrogant beyond belief. Human beings cannot control the climate and must stop meddling with it. There is no energy shortage. The sun takes 45 minutes to provide all the energy we use in one year.'

1. We will outlaw the use and development of climate weapons
immediately.
2. We will withdraw from the Kyoto Treaty immediately.
3. We will decommission all nuclear power stations immediately.
4. We will stop wasting electricity on space heating.
5. We will adopt zero tolerance and polluter pays policies for emission of all substances into the landscape and the atmosphere.
6. We will establish a Lord Lieutenant’s Department with Cabinet status to direct the dismantling of the country’s national piped energy grids. Prince Charles will head the department, negotiate county disconnection dates, issue the money and provide the people.

Ian Gordon [Visitor]
http://tokyobabylon.wordpress.com/
20/08/07 @ 13:36

I take issue with your 'expert' and civil servant nay sayers.

You'd really ask a civil servant to think about how to solve problems? That's novel, I will give you that. They're pen pushers my friend.

Additionally, removing waste, gaseous or otherwise, from the environment goes by many names. In Japan it's called the Toyota Production System. In the USA it's called Natural Capitalism. In Scandinvia it's called The Natural Step. Whatever it's called, it reduces waste and adds to the bottom line of whatever organization it is applied to. So when someone stands up and says the benefit we get from environmental action will be outweighed by the cost I'd advise laughing them off their podium.

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).